Friday, February 24, 2012

Hammond's Flycatcher

This lovely bird makes for a very challenging identification. The Hammond's and the Dusky Flycatcher are nearly indistinguishable apart from their breeding range and their call. When I saw this bird near Patagonia Lake where the species' range overlaps, it was in February, and the bird was silent...


Luckily it was also seen by some birders far more expert than I. After a few days of review they decided it was not a Dusky Flycatcher, as first thought, but was in fact a Hammond's. For my two cents, the Hammond's do seem to be a bit more yellow than the Duskies, but that's something I can only tell from reviewing lots of photographs, not from field-obersvations alone.


The soft grays and yellows make for a beautiful and soft composition, one that seems unique to the Empidonax flycatchers (Warblers and Kingbirds being a stronger yellow). This Hammond's was another one of my favorite sightings on the BiF Tucson trip this February.

12 comments:

  1. Those empis are all difficult to i.d. You did well. I can't believe you were able to capture such beautiful images!! Well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Karen. This Hammond's must've been in the fly-catching zone cause its pretty much ignored me, and then landed maybe 8 feet away at one point, seemingly oblivious to us onlookers.

      Delete
  2. I love Flycatchers but have a difficult time with ID. I love the pose in your second image, what a gorgeous bird!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a mighty fine specimen. I like the family as well, but have trouble differentiating and tend to just think of them as one interchangeable group of empids. It was nice to be birding with people who could tell the differences. We ended up seeing 4 different species that day, but I could've only told maybe 2 of them apart on my own.

      Delete
  3. Excellent captures of this beautiful Flycatcher! I find identification of these guys very difficult; you did an outstanding job, as always!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow Tammy thanks. He made it easier than most, and it provided for a great learning experience.

      Delete
  4. I still struggle with Hammond's/Dusky, although sometimes the differences seem semi-obvious. A good look at that long primary extension will do the trick though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yessir that seems to be the trick. It was nice to get some good, unencumbered views. Thanks for stopping by Seagull

      Delete
  5. Laurence, you ROCK!!! Excellent shots! I would have no clue as to whether it was Hammond's or Dusky. What is "BiF"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! Thanks Peggy. I was lucky to have plenty of help on the Hammonds. BiF is the Birding is Fun acronym. It's a multi-author blog to which I contribute an article once a month. A few of us contributors did a trip through Tucson last weekedn and saw some great birds

      Delete
  6. I'm looking to this Spring as my Empids 101 course. I still have yet to see any, but Acadian's apparently breed in these parts. You're excellent photos are making me want to take the whole genus on!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Best of luck Nicholas! I'm looking forward to your photos and rectellings, I'll be hoping to learn as you share your findings!

      Delete